Journalism

Should Journalists Have A Blog

Garth Beyer

Simple answer: yes.

An analogy I came up with the other night while at a panel discussion on the subject was that if you were to hire a photographer, you would expect them to have a website where you can see what makes them a good photographer. It doesn’t need to just be photos they’ve taken, but what photos they like, what they think about the industry, what their persona is.

The same goes for journalists. If you want to be hired, the first thing employers will do is Google you. They expect to find a website that has content you’ve created as well as more of what you are interested in, enough content that they can tell what kind of person you are.

IMO, it’s not should you. It’s why don’t you already?

Get on that.

Love/Hate Relationship With Famous Quotes

Garth Beyer

A couple posts ago I shared content from a handout given by Adam Schrager, WISC-TV. He quoted Mark Twain for saying “I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.”

That quote was actually written by Blaise Pascal. Not Mark Twain.

There’s an entire faction of study that seeks confirmation of who said what in the history books. It’s all fascinating of course; it’s something I love about famous quotes, but it makes me wonder why any journalist would consider using a respectable quote from the past to strengthen their writing.

Couldn’t Schrager have just said, “it’s worth taking the time to make a letter shorter.” Schrager is already a credible source to be making that statement. Why credit someone else? Especially someone who never even said it.

Even when considering using quotes that are verified, perhaps any Winston Churchill quotes. They are all solid. They are all persuasive and informative. Certainly many of them pack a punch. But still, could you not write it better? Could you not angle it in a way that is more comprehensible for readers of this time and accept the credit you deserve for stating it in such a way?

We can’t keep living in the press of the past, no matter how well spoken people were at the time. And, quite plainly, if I wanted to read what Winston Churchill, Mark Twain, or whoever is wrongly attributed to a famous quote has to say, I’ll pick up their books.

But when I pick up your writing, I want to read your writing.

/rant

Small Words To Communicate Large Ideas

Garth Beyer

The following seven lessons are courtesy of Adam Schrager, WISC-TV

1) One-to-one Relationship: For example, if your mother, father, or roommate asked you, “What happened in class today?” Chances are you wouldn’t answer, “Well, the guest speaker clearly articulated the proper procedure on how to write for the broadcast audience, underscoring the significant and substantive differences between it and the written world for print journalism.” No, hopefully, you’d say something like, “We had a reporter in to discuss how to write for television news.” Write the way you talk.

2) KISS Principle: Keep it simple, stupid. Mark Twain loved to say if he had more time, his books would have been shorter. Simplicity does NOT mean stupidity. To explain the difficult simply is an art form.

3) Be concise: Preferably, one thought per sentence. That’s how people speak.

“It has often been said
there’s so much to be read,
you never can cram
all those words in your head.

So the writer who breeds
more words than he needs
is making a chore
for the reader who reads.

That’s why my belief is
the briefer the brief is,
the greater the sigh
of the reader’s relief is.” – Dr Seuss

4) Avoid jargon/euphemisms: Why would you say, “Airline officials blamed a lack of visibility for the crash,” when you really mean, “Airline officials blame the crash on thick fog.” Why say, “Ford reports that automotive production declined last month,” when you really mean,” Ford officials say the company made fewer cars last month.”

5) Make a commitment: you should be able to state your story in a single sentence with a subject, ver, and object. Everything else, all the details, should flow from there.

6) Activate your sentences: Write in the active voice; use action verbs. For example, why write “The man was arrested by deputies after smashing pumpkins,” when you could write, “Deputies arrested the man for smashing pumpkins.”

7) Write to enhance, not to describe: In broadcast journalism, we see the pictures. We know what we see. Enhance what I’m seeing with something I can’t see, don’t tell me what I’m seeing.

Will Anyone Give A $%*@ About It

Garth Beyer

That’s the first question Dave Florin, president of Hiebing, a PR agency in Madison, asks when it’s time to evaluate an ad campaign or PR strategy.

Here’s a few more bits of wisdom shared:

  • Most marketing philosophies speak over the heads of people. Every strategy needs to pass the “So what” test. If it passes the “So what” test, then it’s much more likely to be paid attention to.
  • Sensitive + awesome = sweet spot
  • Relevant + differentiated = sweet spot
  • Know who the product does not appeal to
  • “Compelling stories are engaging, simple, portable. . . at the end of the day, there is a person there.”

Businesses try to appeal to everyone and waste money on it. The way to good writing is to write to a single person that fits your target. The same goes for creating ads. Create an ad with one person in mind. Every newsroom and broadcast station that I have visited, I can always find a poster of a person that is meant to remind everyone of who they are supposed to be writing to.

Who do you write to? And do they give a $%*@?

Tired Of Professionals Saying They Were Lucky

Garth Beyer

I meet with a lot of reporters, journalists, and PR folk. I hear their stories, I heed their advice, and I ask a lot of questions.

The two most common things that I hear professionals say is

1. Learn to write well, really well.

2. I was lucky that…

The first is a “duh.” The second, well, is a lie.

None of these professionals were lucky that they ran into the headhunter of the PR firm they wanted to work for. They were not lucky that they had the credentials they needed for the job. They were not lucky that they got this or that internship. They were not lucky that the news editor had heard about them already.

These professionals didn’t land in their position by luck. They worked their asses off for it.

The real question is why do these professionals lie? Luck is a curated event, luck is the light at the end of the road, luck is a goal you meet after days, months, years(?) of hard work.

My thought is that everyone knows how difficult it is to become a doctor, yet, people still do. Then why do those in journalism and PR fear that the knowledge of how much work it will be to become a renowned journalist or PRS will stop people from becoming one.

At an even deeper level, why are these professionals not proud of how hard they worked?

I don’t have the answers for you right now. I’m not in their position. I know how difficult it is. I know how much I need to work to get where I want to be. I know the difficult leaps I need to take. I know that where I end up won’t be from luck.

When I find out the answers to these questions though, I will let you know.

Seriously, Do You Need To Be Reminded?

Garth Beyer

I had a reporter from a large local news station contact me today, and I was left disappointed.

To maintain my ethical integrity, I will break the message down into its two parts instead of actually sharing what the message said.

“(1) This is what we think we know, (2) we would like to do a story on that. (3) You can reach me here.

(4)Thanks…”

There are many reasons I am sharing this. All are important.

1. (1) This is what we think we know

He was completely off! He knew nothing. It showed that he had done absolutely no research. If you’re not going to do the research, don’t state that you know something. Be blunt and say that you know nothing and want to be informed.

If, however, the information you think you know can’t be found online at all, then at least say that you have looked (and you better have looked hard!) and couldn’t find the information.

2. There was no introduction. Just because you’re a reporter doesn’t mean that someone is going to respond to you. If anything, it makes you seem like a robot, just working the grind of news writing. I can’t imagine what sort of story this reporter will write.

3. (2) we would like to do a story on that

Is that a question? Because if it is, I’m going to opt out. Say you are writing a story on that, not that you want to.

Lastly, there was no call for action in his email. In my head I thought, “Well, great, mr.reporter (purposely in lowercase), I’m glad to hear you have a sense of something false and would like to do a story on it.”

Pitch your writing topic to your editor or boss, not to who is supposed to be your story.

If I was actually able to respond to this reporter (I wasn’t able to, it went to my supervisor), I would have emailed him back with two words.

Good luck.

 

Turn Your Beat Into A Book (summary: writers)

Garth Beyer

I attended a conference that hosted a panel of writers and publishers. Happy to share what I took from the writers panel with you.

  • 10 tips that one writer gave
  • Think about writing before reporting. Reporting will be natural and more apparent the deeper you get into the story.
  • He or she who hesitates “gets scooped.”
  • What you need:
    • To be gregarious
    • To prepare
    • To know when to cut bait (get out of a situation)
    • To have faith in the project
    • To make something new
  • When writing a book, always try to find more time. Time that is constructed for the sole purpose of writing.
  • “Most important picture is the next one, not the last one,” said a the photojournalist.

Lastly, and worth not having in a bullet point, always try to keep a project going.